Monat: Oktober 2020

The Bitcoin (BTC) price at the time of writing is around $11,400. We look at the charts and discuss the possible scenarios, read the update here!

Buy 1000 euros of Bitcoin without commission? Get started at Bitvavo
Bitcoin update
It still looks bullish, Bitcoin’s course. With a test towards $12,000 in recent days, we can see the strength of the upward trend again at the moment.

The first test of over $11,700 has not yet held up. But support is already being found in several places. As a result of which the upward trend is once again in sight.

By keeping this level above $11,000 we can see that the price is still moving strongly. And keeping a price above $10,000 for a long time.

Signals that may indicate that we will soon also be able to see the $12,000. So far, however, that has been a difficult place for Bitcoin’s price. This could result in a strong reaction, with a chance of another dip.

Bitcoin day chart

The daily chart of Bitcoin’s share price shows a nice upward trend in recent days. With the breaking up of $11,350 which now also serves as support. The place where the price is now, around $11,400, is where we saw a longer consolidation last time. After which the exchange rate broke down, only to come back again now.

So there is a chance that we are going to see another period of consolidation. That depends on whether the current support around $11,350 knows how to hold.

But it also depends on whether the resistance around $11,750 gives a lot of resistance. However, we do see that the price is moving strongly upwards and a test of $11,750 may come soon. Should this test fail, we will most likely repeat the movement we saw during August.

Bitcoin day chart 15 October 2020

As a result, consolidation can continue for a longer period of time. Provided we see more volume and the price continues to rise. Then $12,000 quickly comes into sight. And it is important that $11,750 is maintained as support for a $12,000 test. Otherwise we will fall back into the consolidation zone.

With a dip down, $11,350 would be strong enough to sustain the price. Especially considering the many support and tests of this level. A lower dip is not to be expected, provided that bearish volume will suddenly rise sharply. What we do not see happening at the moment.

A consolidation or short-term increase are therefore the most obvious at the moment. Whether we will actually see the $12,000 soon depends, among other things, on the volume.

For the time being, as it looks now, consolidation is obvious and we will make this level a lot stronger again. In this way, the $10,000 will remain further and further behind us, a good sign!

Die in Russland ansässige Revil Cyber ​​Gang hat BTC im Wert von 1 Million US-Dollar in einem öffentlichen Forum eingereicht, um neue Gesichter für sich zu gewinnen. Die Revil Group ist bekannt dafür, Ransomware-Angriffe durchzuführen und ihre Opfer zu erpressen. Die Gruppe stahl einmal 1 TB Informationen aus der Anwaltskanzlei Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks und forderte ein Lösegeld, weil sie diese nicht weitergegeben hatte.

Es scheint, dass die Cyber-Bande jetzt versucht, neue Gesichter hinzuzufügen, um das Ausmaß der Angriffe zu erhöhen. Die Bande zielt darauf ab, professionelle Hacker neu zu ergänzen , um Angriffe zu verstärken. Um Vertrauen zu schaffen und ihre Eignung zu demonstrieren, hat die Revil-Cyberbande 99 Bitcoin Circuit im Wert von fast 1 Million US-Dollar auf einer offenen Plattform für Cyberkriminelle eingereicht .

Der RaaS-Betrieb der REvil Cyber ​​Gang ist privat

Die meisten Ransomware-Angriffe werden als Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) ausgeführt. Die Entwickler von Malware haben die Aufgabe, den Schadcode und den Zahlungsweg zu erstellen und zu gestalten. Anschließend werden Partner registriert, um Entitäten zu verletzen und Ransomware-Angriffe zu starten.

Im Rahmen des Deals erhalten Entwickler zwischen 30 und 20 Prozent des Lösegeldbetrags, den jeder Partner verdient. Die verbundenen Unternehmen tendieren dazu, den Rest des Erlöses zwischen 70 und 80 Prozent zu halten. Innerhalb der Revil-Struktur ist die RaaS-Operation eine abgeschlossene Anordnung. Dies bedeutet, dass die Partner untersucht und befragt werden, bevor sie Teil des Prozesses werden.

Die Rekrutierung von Revil gibt Anlass zur Sorge

Die Bitcoin-Einzahlung sollte die Sicherheit erhöhen und das Vertrauen in die Hacking-Gruppe gewinnen. Die Mittel wurden von einem Registrierungsposten begleitet, in dem die Vorzüge der von ihnen beschafften Charaktere dargelegt wurden. Einige der genannten Fähigkeiten umfassen Penetrationstests, Erfahrung mit msf / cs / koadic, nas / tape, hyper-v.

Der leitende Wissenschaftler des Cybersicherheitsunternehmens McAfee, Raj Samani, erklärte, dass die jüngste Einschreibungsübung der Revil-Cyberbande Anlass zur Sorge gebe. Zurück im Jahr 2019, McAfee porträtierte den Ring als die Reinkarnation der GandCrab Cyber – Bande , die die Operationen von 23 regierungsnahen Organisationen in den Vereinigten Staaten unterbrochen

Bitcoin-minedrift er en ret simpel aktivitet fra et første-princippet økonomi-pov. Al anden aktivitet i netværket er komplementær og baseret på dette princip, og hvis Bitcoin ikke havde nogen andet end dets minearbejdere, ville den stadig overleve. Minedrift fortolkes imidlertid fejlagtigt af de fleste.

Hashrate påvirker pris eller hash følger pris. Ingen af ​​disse gælder i sin helhed, men det er kendt, at minearbejdere konsekvent leverer Bitcoin til børser og hjælper med at opretholde valutareserver. De sælger Bitcoin for at imødekomme deres driftsomkostninger. Denne aktivitet skaber pres på salgssiden, men dette hjælper netværk og detailhandlere ved at generere udbud til at absorbere efterspørgsel. Dette indikerer ikke, at minearbejdere har en uforholdsmæssig og enstemmig højborg på Bitcoin.

Minekapitulering og minearbejders positionsindeks er nogle få minedata, der er proportionale med Bitcoins pris. De er dog simpelthen indikatorer til forudsigelse af priser. Følgende diagram sporer ændringer i minepositionsværdien siden 2013.

Når Mining Position Value falder til under 0, indikerer det, at minearbejdere skifter Bitcoin, hvilket er en underlig udvikling i sig selv. Imidlertid har der i 2020 været flere tilfælde, hvor værdien er faldet til under 0. Der er ingen tendens til, at Mining Position Value følger, og det gør det uforudsigeligt, men for sent er Bitcoin-valutareserver faldet drastisk. Tilstrømningen af ​​Bitcoin til børser er på et laveste niveau sammenlignet med 2019 eller året før, og dette peger på muligheden for, at minearbejdere er HODLing Bitcoin.

De fleste Bitcoin fra minedrift rammer børser, men det har ændret sig inden for de sidste 4 uger.

Børser modtog primært Bitcoin fra minedrift og i øjeblikket forlader kun 44% af Bitcoin minedrift for at ramme børser. Dette tal er faldet fra 60% inden for de sidste 6 måneder. Minepulje Bitcoin registreres som i transit og fra transit rammer den tegnebøger i netværket. Minedrift vanskeligheder er vokset betydeligt, men minepuljer betaler regningen for driftsomkostninger, mens hodling Bitcoin venter på hvad?

En tyrkørsel?

Hvis dette ikke er en ventetid, signalerer diagrammer, at dette er skabelsen af ​​en bull run? Minearbejdere har muligvis ingen direkte indflydelse på priserne, men minepuljer har det. Minepuljekoncentration kan være årsagen til, at der er flere spekulative prisbobler i hver fase af Bitcoins markedscyklus. Find ud af mere om det her.

Det er en kendt kendsgerning, at miner kapitulation blandt andre faktorer er en forudsætning for en bull run. Minekapitulation er begyndt, og på trods af prisudsving på spotbørser har det ikke ændret mønsteret. Minearbejdere er HODLing og BTC tilstrømning til børser er faldet 37% på 1 dag. Det er muligt, at vi lukker ind i starten af ​​et tyrløb.

A new survey by RUSI and ACAMS shows the extent to which opinions differ between cryptographic professionals and members of financial institutions and governments.

A British think tank has conducted an industry-wide survey on the risks of crypto currencies. A total of 566 experts from the traditional financial and crypto ecosystem were surveyed. These include financial regulators and financial intelligence agencies. As expected, opinions vary widely depending on the industry sector. Of those surveyed, 32 percent are from North America, 23 percent from Europe and 22 percent from Asia. 49 per cent are employees of financial institutions, 24 per cent are government employees and 10 per cent are directly involved in the crypto industry.

Less than half of the respondents (45 per cent) therefore agree that crypto-currencies should be considered legal tender. However, three quarters (76 per cent) of those employed in the crypto industry agree with this view. The difference is even greater when it comes to financial inclusion. 89 per cent from the crypto-economy agree here, while among financial institutions (42 per cent) and governments (47 per cent) again less than half agree.

The survey results regarding the use of crypto currencies are also enlightening. All respondents think that crypto-currency is mainly used for investments. But among those who do not work in the crypto-currency industry, the suspicion that crypto-currency is mainly used for illegal purposes is much stronger. This opinion is held by 35 percent of the employees of financial institutions. Of those working in the crypto industry, only a tiny two percent believe this.

Crypto currencies: Opportunities and risks

When asked whether they see the use of crypto currencies as a risk or an opportunity, the crypto currency industry continues to see the crypto currency on the rise compared to other sectors. More than three-quarters (80%) of the crypto-currency industry respondents view the use of crypto-currency as an opportunity. Only one-fifth of respondents from other sectors (19% for financial institutions, 23% for governments and 20% for the private sector) agree. Even more alarmingly, these sectors predominantly view the crypto-currency as a risk. This is the view of 63 per cent of those surveyed in financial institutions and 56 per cent of those surveyed in governments. There is broad agreement among respondents about the risk of financial crime. 58 % think that the crypto industry is the one that knows best how to assess the risks. Politicians (11 per cent) and the part of the public that does not have crypto-currencies (5 per cent) come off much worse.

The survey was commissioned by the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) together with ACAMS, a leading provider of workforce solutions headquartered in the United States.